SEO article evaluation
Audit any blog post against a 21-point helpful content checklist and get a clear, consistent scorecard.
Overview
Editing is easier when teams know exactly what’s holding a piece back. The SEO article evaluation agent reads any blog article you provide and evaluates it against a 21-question helpful content checklist. The result is a clean, consistent scorecard that helps writers spot gaps, align on revisions, and track improvements across drafts and content types. It’s a quick way to assess whether an article delivers depth, clarity, originality, and a satisfying reader experience.
See it in action
Capabilities
- Gives content teams a fast way to sanity-check whether an article feels genuinely helpful, complete, and original.
- Flags gaps that can erode trust (for example, weak sourcing, thin expertise signals, or unclear purpose) so you know what to strengthen.
- Creates a consistent, repeatable scorecard teams can use to compare drafts, align stakeholders, and track improvements over time.
Example output
<div class="table-shell">
<div class="table-scroll">
<table class="universal-table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Evaluation question</th>
<th>Answer</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Does the content provide original information, reporting, research, or analysis?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Does the content provide a substantial, complete, or comprehensive description of the topic?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond the obvious?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
If the content draws on other sources, does it avoid simply copying or rewriting those sources,
and instead provide substantial additional value and originality?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Does the main heading or page title provide a descriptive, helpful summary of the content?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggerating or being shocking in nature?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Is this the sort of page you'd want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Would you expect to see this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Is the content free of spelling or stylistic issues?
</td>
<td>true</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
Continues with the rest of the table, evaluating the content against the remaining 11 criteria.
Agent workflow
Step 1: Trigger the workflow
The user pastes a blog article URL and runs the agent.
Step 2: Read the article content
The agent retrieves and reads the full text of the article from the provided URL.
Step 3: Evaluate against 21 questions
It reviews the full article against a predefined 21-question helpful content checklist and determines a true/false answer for each question.
Step 4: Return the scorecard
The agent outputs a structured table one row per question and a true/false answer only.
Work AI that works.
Get a demo